As droughts and floods become more frequent and extreme
around the world, companies from food and beverage makers to the mining and
energy industries are beginning to scrutinize their operations for
vulnerability to water problems that could increase their costs or disrupt
production.
The concept of “water risk” is catching on as a way of thinking
about potential exposure not just to shortages or deluges, but also pollution,
regulatory troubles or increases in the prices of water and water-dependent raw
materials.
“Businesses manage risk, that’s one of the main functions of
management,” said Adrian Sym, executive director of the Alliance for Water
Stewardship, a group that promotes the responsible use of water.
In the case of water, “it could be ‘Do I have enough water
to do what I need to do for this business? Is the quality of this water
sufficient to enable me to do that?”’ and will local authorities remain willing
to license a company’s usage, Mr. Sym said. “These are the things businesses
are dealing with.”
Water supply stresses are intensifying everywhere from
California to South Africa, the result of climate change, booming populations
and the growing numbers of people moving to cities and adopting resource-intensive,
middle-class lifestyles.
The World Economic Forum, in its annual report on global
risks, published in January, ranked water crises as the third-biggest risk to
stability in the decade ahead, behind fiscal crises and unemployment. Without
changes in business practices, the demand for fresh water could be 40 percent
higher than supply by 2030, according to the 2030 Water Resource Group, a
public-private consortium that is housed within the World Bank’s International
Finance Corp.
The first to feel the pinch, and to begin doing something
about it, have been food and beverage companies, which depend heavily on water
for their basic ingredients. Agriculture accounts for an estimated 75 percent
to 80 percent of world water use.
“When we look at how our business operates, we use a lot of
output from Mother Nature, and that stuff doesn’t happen without water,” said
Jerry Lynch, vice president and chief sustainability officer at General Mills,
whose brands include Cheerios, Pillsbury and Green Giant. “You don’t grow
plants, cows don’t produce milk without water. So it’s pretty fundamental to
our business.”
Clothing and other textile-based industries that depend on
cotton — a particularly thirsty crop — or on water-intensive dying processes
are also exposed. Paper production and mining, too, are big water users.
So is the energy sector. Water is key to many of the
industry’s most basic processes, from coal mining and fracking, or hydraulic
fracturing, to the cooling of gas, coal and nuclear power plants. Energy
production accounts for 15 percent of all water consumption, the United Nations
said in releasing a March report on water and energy.
The coal industry in particular has done little to address
its heavy water usage, said Iris Cheng, a climate and water expert at
Greenpeace International, based in Amsterdam.
The problem is acute in China, where coal generation is
widespread and authorities want to locate new power plants away from cities
because of concerns about air pollution, she said. That often means they end up
in arid parts of the country’s west, draining water that is needed for farming
and other purposes, Ms. Cheng said.
Many energy firms, Ms, Cheng said, are reluctant to say too
much publicly about their water usage. “Because people realize they’re very
exposed, they’re being very, very careful about how and when they report on
their water risk,” she said.
The Alliance for Water Stewardship, backed by big companies
like Nestlé and General Mills, as well as water and environmental groups including
the Nature Conservancy and WaterAid, in April published detailed guidelines
that businesses can use to assess their water risk.
Water issues are inherently local, and the new standard
encourages business to work with other users in their area, from residents and
small-scale farmers to government officials, said Mr. Sym.
While companies have generally regarded water as the public
sector’s responsibility, many governments are no longer able to pay for the
necessary infrastructure investments, said Thomas Chiramba, head of the fresh
water unit at the United Nations Environment Program, which helped develop the
alliance’s standard.
“Everyone has to chip in, because water is everyone’s
business,” Mr. Chiramba said.
Not everyone is impressed by big companies’ talk about water
awareness and responsibility.
Alex Money, a researcher at the University of Oxford’s Smith
School of Enterprise and the Environment, who surveyed 60 of the world’s
biggest companies, said he found that most of them had done more in the past to
improve water efficiency than they planned to do in the future.
Mr. Money said that reflected the reality that most
businesses trying to reduce water usage would have begun with the easiest,
highest-return measures, meaning they stood to gain little from the next steps,
which are likely to be more expensive and deliver less savings.
Still, Laurent Auguste, innovation and markets director at
Veolia Environnement, a French contractor that provides water services, said he
saw companies’ concerns about water issues moving from technical specialists
and corporate social responsibility departments to the offices of top
executives.
In Qatar, for example, Veolia is helping to eliminate all
discharge from a Shell natural gas liquefaction plant, treating all wastewater
so the factory can reuse it.
“We are at a time when pressure on the resource will lead
people to be smarter,” he said. “But we are very much at the starting point.”
The companies taking water most seriously are those that
operate in the developing world, said Adebayo Adeloye, a professor of water
resources management at Heriot-Watt University in Edinburgh. While wealthy
countries may suffer from drought too, the most acute problems are in poor
nations that lack the infrastructure to cope, he said.
In places like Nigeria, some companies are trying to ensure
their own water supplies by building mini-reservoirs or dams and installing
storage tanks, he said.
“Where they know that nothing is guaranteed, companies are
taking this very, very seriously and looking at ways they can make themselves
self-sufficient,” he said. “People in those countries literally have turned
themselves into mini-utilities because of the failure of the framework.”
In parts of Africa and southern Asia, big companies are also
beginning to consider helping governments finance new water infrastructure in
places where it would enable them to expand their businesses, said Mr. Money.
It’s “the idea of corporate water return as the counterpart
to corporate water risk,” he said.
Over all, Mr. Money said, most companies only focus
seriously on water if it is likely to have a clear impact on their bottom line.
“No one cares more than companies about making a profit, so to the extent that
it affects their business this stuff is for real,” he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment